Conrad v. Nall
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne Circuit. This action was brought by James Nall, jr., Hubbard N. Duncklee and Jolin H Shepard, for tbe use and benefit of James Nall, jr., against Louis Conrad. The trial was by jury, and the verdict and judgment for tbe plaintiffs. The defendant brings the cause to this court on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtGuayes, J.
This was a suit in debt, commenced by defendants in error on June 5,1871, in the circuit court for the county of Wayne, on a judgment recovered in the same court, on* the 9th day of September, 1858.
The plaintiff in error, with his plea of the general issue,, gave notice that he would insist on the statute of limitations as a defense to the action. On the trial, the plaintiffs-proved the judgment set forth in the declaration, and gave evidence tending to prove that the defendant had been absent-from, and resided out of, the state and in the state of Ohio for the space of about four years. The…
2Cited by14 opinions
- McGuire v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Wymer v. HolmesMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
- McClure v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Farrell v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892
- Fowler v. Board of RegistrationMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.