Loflin v. Home Insurance
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
1. A special ground of a motion for a new trial is not in proper form for consideration unless it is complete withip itself. Franklin v. State, 28 Ga. App. 460 (1 b) (112 S. E. 170), and cit. (a) *247It is not complete witliin itself if, to be intelligible, it is necessary to refer to other grounds of the motion (Dixon v. State, 28 Ga. App. 756 (3), 113 S. E. 24, and cit.), or to the brief of evidence, or to some other portion of the record. McCall v. State, 23 Ga. App. 770 (99 S. E. 471). Under these rulings, special grounds 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the motion for a new trial are not in proper form for…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McCall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
- Franklin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- Dixon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
3Cited by3 opinions
- Canal Insurance v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Dillard v. Jacksons Atlanta Ready Mix Concrete Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Home Insurance v. LoflinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930