A. O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc. v. Griffith
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
LAVENDER, Justice.
This is an action for damages alleged to' have resulted from the breach of an implied warranty of fitness.
The plaintiff in the trial court at alt times involved was a dairy operator. The defendants, Edwards Equipment Company and A. O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc., were the dealer and manufacturer respectively of a certain silo-type system designed for the storage of hay to be subsequently fed to cattle. The implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose concerned the silo-type structures and the “particular purpose” concerned, apparently, the plaintiff’s method of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McInteer v. GillespieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
3Cited by1 opinion
- Vickers v. ViningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969