Legal Opinion

A. O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc. v. Griffith

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 25, 1967No. 40720PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LAVENDER, Justice.

This is an action for damages alleged to' have resulted from the breach of an implied warranty of fitness.

The plaintiff in the trial court at alt times involved was a dairy operator. The defendants, Edwards Equipment Company and A. O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc., were the dealer and manufacturer respectively of a certain silo-type system designed for the storage of hay to be subsequently fed to cattle. The implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose concerned the silo-type structures and the “particular purpose” concerned, apparently, the plaintiff’s method of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McInteer v. GillespieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Vickers v. ViningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API