Legal Opinion
United States v. Augspurger
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided September 13, 1979No. CIV-76-595PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM and ORDER
ELFVIN, District Judge.
Defendants have moved individually for reconsideration and modification of this court’s Memorandum and Order entered March 20, 1978 (reported at 452 F.Supp. 659).
Defendant Augspurger based her motion on Fed.R.Civ.P. rules 59 and 60. These rules do not apply in the instant case because no final judgment or order has been issued; the exact amount of the penalty to be paid by defendant Loeb, Rhoades & Co. remains to be determined. See, Fed.R. Civ.P. rule 54(b). The motion will be considered as if brought pursuant to rule 54(b).
Defendant Augspurger…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Enochs v. Williams Packing & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bob Jones University v. SimonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State of New Jersey v. MoriarityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1967
- United States v. AugspurgerDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1978
- Stephanie Bauer v. John E. Foley, as District Director of Internal Revenue Service, Buffalo District, and the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kane v. Capital Guardian Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Sharon Steel Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- United States v. Marine Midland Bank, N.A.District Court, W.D. New York · 1987
- United States v. AugspurgerDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1981
- Medor v. Lamb (In Re Lamb)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.