Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Hanford Superior Court Judge

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 4, 2020No. 1:20-cv-00390Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ANTOINE DESHAWN BARNES, Case No. 1:20-cv-00390-AWI-SAB 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF 12 v. ACTION FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER, FAILURE TO 13 HANFORD SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE, et PROSECUTE, AND FAILURE TO STATE A al., COGNIZABLE CLAIM FOR RELIEF 14 Defendants. (ECF No. 18) 15 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN THIRTY 16 DAYS 17 18 Antoine Deshawn Barnes (“Plaintiff”) is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this 19 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 I. 21…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API