Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Bullock

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1975No. 2209PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.

We are called upon to review asserted errors in jury instructions that allegedly misled the jury, resulting in an inadequate award of damages.

In July of 1970 on Elmendorf Air Force Base, an automobile driven by Steven H. Bullock collided with a car in which the two Martinez children were riding. Edwin, then eight years old, and Edwardo, then eleven years old, suffered facial lacerations which produced scars. The scars were treated non-surgically because of a family history of “bad scarring”. The total medical expenses incurred amounted to $80.20.

The parents of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Love v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Concerned Citizens of South Kenai Peninsula v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1974

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Breck v. UlmerAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Poulin v. ZartmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Des Jardins v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Chenega Corp. v. Exxon Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Beech Aircraft Corp. v. HarveyAlaska Supreme Court · 1976

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API