Collins v. Plant Insulation Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BANKE, J.
I. Introduction
Defendant Plant Insulation Company appeals from the judgment against it in this asbestos case, claiming the trial court erred in excluding the United States Navy from the list of entities as to which the jury could apportion “fault” pursuant to Proposition 51. We agree, and reverse and remand for a retrial on apportionment.
II. Factual and Procedural Background
We set forth only those facts pertinent to the appeal. Plaintiffs and respondents Cloristeen Collins and Patricia Collins (plaintiffs) are, respectively, the wife and daughter of Ulysses Collins (Collins).…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- O'NEIL v. Crane Co.California Supreme Court · 2012
- Lewis v. City of BeniciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Ginsberg v. GamsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012