Legal Opinion

State v. Gillespie

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 14, 1981No. 3-581A131PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRARD, Judge.

Gillespie was charged with attempted dealing in a schedule II controlled substance. He filed a motion to dismiss upon which the court heard argument and received evidence. It was stipulated by the parties that the substance delivered by Gillespie was not a controlled substance. It was crushed common aspirin. In addition, Gillespie testified that Collins, an undercover police officer, had on several occasions attempted to induce Gillespie to procure drugs for him. According to Gillespie, he decided to both teach Collins a lesson and get him to stop bothering Gillespie. He…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Martin Molina Oviedo, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  2. Zickefoose v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  3. United States v. Peter Harold KornCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. United States v. Abel v. QuijadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  5. Smith, Peak v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. Everett, GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  2. State v. D.M.Z.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. State v. KingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Warthan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  5. King v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API