King v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
YOUNG, Judge.
Fredrick King was convicted of attempting to receive stolen property. He appeals his conviction on three grounds:(1) the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction;(2) the jury verdict was defective; and(3) the verdict of guilty was contrary to law because the items involved were not in fact stolen.
We remand this cause to the trial court to correct its judgment to show appellant was convicted of Count III of the indict ment rather than Count I. On all other issues the trial court's judgment is affirmed.
This case arose from two sting operations conducted by the Marion…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Zickefoose v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
- Rowan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
- Biggerstaff v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
- Grimm v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Williamson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Armstead v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
- Frederick Jay King v. Stephen GoldsmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- State v. HainesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- Hewell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Spindler v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.