J. P. Realty Trust v. Public Service Mutual Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Murphy, P. J. (dissenting in part).
I agree with the majority that a declaration should be made that Public must defend and indemnify the plaintiffs in the wrongful death action. However, I believe that the contribution between the two insurers should be upon a pro rata basis.
Where the provisions of a policy are clear and unambiguous, they must be given their plain and ordinary meaning. The courts should refrain from rewriting such an agreement (Government Employees Ins. Co. v Kligler, 42 NY2d 863, 864; see, generally, 29 NY Jur, Insurance, §§ 597-598). The “mirroring” language under…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Government Employees Insurance v. KliglerNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Commercial Union Assurance Companies v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1978
- Ryder Truck Rental v. US Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1981
- Weinberg & Holman, Inc. v. Providence Washington InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Argonaut Insurance Co. v. Cotton States Mut. Ins. Co.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.