Legal Opinion · Dissent

J. P. Realty Trust v. Public Service Mutual Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 5, 1984Published

1Dissent

Murphy, P. J. (dissenting in part).

I agree with the majority that a declaration should be made that Public must defend and indemnify the plaintiffs in the wrongful death action. However, I believe that the contribution between the two insurers should be upon a pro rata basis.

Where the provisions of a policy are clear and unambiguous, they must be given their plain and ordinary meaning. The courts should refrain from rewriting such an agreement (Government Employees Ins. Co. v Kligler, 42 NY2d 863, 864; see, generally, 29 NY Jur, Insurance, §§ 597-598). The “mirroring” language under…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Government Employees Insurance v. KliglerNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Commercial Union Assurance Companies v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1978
  3. Ryder Truck Rental v. US Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1981
  4. Weinberg & Holman, Inc. v. Providence Washington InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. Argonaut Insurance Co. v. Cotton States Mut. Ins. Co.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API