Legal Opinion

Paulette Stenzel v. Best Buy Company Inc

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 2017No. 328804Published

1Opinion of the Court

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PAULETTE STENZEL, FOR PUBLICATION June 27, 2017 Plaintiff-Appellant, 9:00 a.m. v No. 328804 Ingham Circuit Court BEST BUY COMPANY, INC., and SAMSUNG LC No. 14-000527-NO ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., Defendants-Appellees. Before: SERVITTO, P.J., and MURPHY, CAVANAGH, FORT HOOD, BORRELLO, GLEICHER, and SHAPIRO, JJ. MURPHY, J. Pursuant to MCR 7.215(J), this special panel was convened to resolve a conflict between the prior opinion issued in this case, Stenzel v Best Buy Co, Inc, __ Mich App __; __ NW2d __ (2016), vacated solely with respect to part II(C) of the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. McDougall v. SchanzMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Perin v. PeulerMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Estes v. TitusMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Loweke v. Ann Arbor Ceiling & Partition Co, LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Haliw v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API