Hencken v. City of Morgan Hill
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
—Claiming that the defendant city had entered into an illegal contract, “Exhibit A”, the plaintiff commenced this action to have it so declared and for other relief. The municipal authorities filed a general demurrer to the plaintiff’s amended complaint. The demurrer was sustained without leave to amend and judgment was entered for the defendants. From that judgment the plaintiff has appealed. The contract claimed to be illegal is as follows:
I. “This indenture of lease made this 7th day of May, 1930, by and between R. H. Hencken and Eleanor Hencken, his wife, of the Town of Morgan Hill,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McBean v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Garrett v. SwantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Garrity v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
3Cited by4 opinions
- Anderson v. Wyoming Development Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1944
- Roberts v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Whitson v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Strum v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1947