Legal Opinion

Rohn Industries, Inc. v. Platinum Equity LLC

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided October 20, 2006No. 591, 2005PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELE, Chief Justice.

Platinum Equity LLC (“Platinum”) scheduled to acquire certain of Rohn Industries, Inc.’s (“Rohn”) assets before the end of 2002, terminated an Asset Purchase Agreement with Rohn under a provision that allowed for termination if Platinum determined in good faith that there was a reasonable basis in law and in fact to conclude that Platinum could reasonably be anticipated to incur any material asbestos related liability after consummating the acquisition. The parties agree that New York law governs their dispute over the contract language. The trial judge determined that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Brooklyn v. . Brooklyn City R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Sonitrol Holding Co. v. Marceau InvestissementsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  3. Emmons v. Hartford Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
  4. Scharf v. Edgcomb Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2004
  5. Morin Building Products Company, Inc. v. Baystone Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Seaford Golf & Country Club v. E.I. duPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  2. In Re Tronox, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  3. Pedrick v. RotenDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2014
  4. West Pan, Inc. v. Perry (In re West Pan, Inc.)District Court, S.D. New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API