Legal Opinion
Modrell v. Hayden
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided March 13, 2009No. 3:06-cv-00074PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
THOMAS B. RUSSELL, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion to Alter, Amend and/or Vacate (Docket # 78). Defendants have filed a response (Docket #79), to which Plaintiff has replied (Docket # 80). This matter is now ripe for adjudication. For the reasons that follow, Plaintiffs Motion is GRANTED IN PART.
BACKGROUND
On May 30, 2005, an individual reported to the McCracken County Sheriffs Office that Plaintiff Phillip Murray Modrell’s son, Richard Modrell, was delivering methamphetamine to local convenience stores while on duty as a Domino’s…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Garay v. LirianoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Crehan v. DavisDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2010
- Cherry v. HowieDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2016
- Jones v. PRAMSTALLERDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
- Phillip Modrell v. Jon HaydenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.