Legal Opinion

Walstad v. Walstad

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 2012No. 20120059PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Catherine Walstad appeals from a judgment awarding her $37,222.90 in her action against Richard Walstad for fraudulently concealing marital property during the parties’ 1994 divorce. She argues punitive damages may be recovered from a former spouse who concealed assets in a stipulated property settlement agreement in a prior divorce action and the district court abused its discretion in denying her motion to amend her complaint to assert a claim against Richard Walstad for punitive damages. We conclude a district court has equitable authority in an independent action…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. BeggerlySupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Rubenstein v. RubensteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Hoverson v. HoversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Hamilton v. HamiltonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Darby v. SWENSON, INC.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Walstad v. WalstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Wald v. WaldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Jacobs-Raak v. RaakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Interest of J.M.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Sateren v. SaterenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API