Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Billingsley

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 8, 1981No. 79-691PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

At issue is whether a prosecutor may comment on a defendant's failure to call his spouse to testify where it appears the spouse's testimony would be probative on the question of defendant's guilt or innocence. We hold that such comment is improper.

Defendant/petitioner was convicted of second degree murder and sentenced to twenty years' imprisonment. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed. As one basis for its decision, the Court of Criminal Appeals held that a spouse is a competent witness until he or she elects not to testify. The court reasoned that, since the spouse is competent and is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Arnold v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  2. Holyfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  3. Billingsley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hunt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  2. Ex Parte TomlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. J.D.S. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  4. Morgan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  5. Coleman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API