Legal Opinion
Hixson v. Plump
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided October 24, 1997No. 96-578PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAmestoy, C.J.
Ralph Plump appeals a Windsor Family Court order that he pay $1,000 per month to Evelyn Hixson, his former spouse and the mother of their two children. Plump argues that (1) under applicable New York and Vermont statutes of limitations, the court lacked authority to enter such an order, and (2) the court erred by ordering monthly payments without entering judgment for the total amount owed by him to Hixson. We affirm.
Defendant Ralph Plump and plaintiff Evelyn Hixson married in New York State in 1959. The couple’s two children were born in 1960 and 1961. The parties divorced in 1973, and under…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Duffy v. Horton Memorial HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Beatty v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1933
- Heisse v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
- Hunt v. HuntSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
- Augenblick v. Town of CortlandtNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Estate of PetersSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- Town of Pawlet v. Daniel BanyaiSupreme Court of Vermont · 2024
- Desrochers v. DesrochersSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- Stein v. SteinSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- In re CrannellSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.