Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Peters

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 20, 2000No. 99-154 & 99-258PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAmestoy, C.J.

Defendant Carroll Peters appeals from a Lamoille Superior Court jury verdict for plaintiff in a civil action for a sexual battery he allegedly committed against Cheryl Peters. Defendant raises six arguments on appeal: (1) the action is barred by the statute of limitations; (2) in a tort action for battery between spouses, a finding that consent to sexual intercourse has been withdrawn is a prerequisite to liability; (3) the trial court erred by allowing out-of-court statements made by Mrs. Peters, the deceased victim, to be admitted; (4) the compensatory damages are excessive; (5) the trial…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Duffy v. Horton Memorial HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Winey v. William E. Dailey, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  3. People v. LibertaNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. State v. MoatsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  5. United States v. Jimmy Lee NapierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In Re Eastview at Middlebury, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  2. State v. MuscariSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  3. Sweet v. RoySupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  4. Benson v. MVP Health Plan, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  5. Vermont Human Rights Commission v. State of Vermont, Agency of TransportationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API