Legal Opinion
Fiore v. Walden
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 12, 2011No. 08-17558PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order; Dissent to Order by Judge O’SCANNLAIN; Dissent to Order by Judge McKEOWN; Opinion by Judge BERZON; Dissent by Judge IKUTA.
ORDER
The opinion, filed on September 12, 2011, is withdrawn and replaced by the amended opinion attached to this order.
With this amendment, the majority of the panel has voted to deny appellee’s petition for rehearing. Judge Berzon has *562voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Goodwin so recommends. Judge Ikuta has voted to grant the petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the petition for…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Dudnikov v. Chalk & Vermilion Fine Arts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Imo Industries, Inc. v. Kiekert AgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Eighteen Seventy v. JaysonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
- San Diego County Credit Union v. CefcuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- State v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- DFSB Kollective Co. v. BourneDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.