Legal Opinion

Dosekun v. State Farm Lloyds

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided June 23, 2011No. Civil Action No. H-10-4238PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION

LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge.

This is a suit to recover insurance proceeds and damages under the Texas Insurance Code, §§ 541.052, 541.060, and 541.061. The plaintiff, Arkinsan Dosekun, alleges that the defendant, State Farm Lloyds (“State Farm”), engaged in deceptive acts violating the Texas Insurance Code and the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act (“DTPA”). The defendants timely removed. (Docket Entry Nos. 1, 7). The defendant invoked the Texas Insurance Code requirement that a plaintiff seeking damages under the statute must give prior written notice of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hines v. HashTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. ValenciaTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Richardson v. Foster & Sear, L.L.P.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2008
  4. Williams v. Hills Fitness Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1985

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re CYPRESS TEXAS LLOYDS, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2011
  2. in Re State Farm Lloyds, Richard Freyman, and Nathan Burris, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2014
  3. in Re: Cypress Texas Lloyds, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2011
  4. in Re: Cypress Texas Lloyds, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2011
  5. in Re: Cypress Texas Lloyds, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API