Legal Opinion
Mineo v. Owen W. Young, M.D., P. C.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 13, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Qualification -of an expert is a matter left to the sound discretion of the trial court (see, Meiselman v Crown Hgts. Hosp., 285 NY 389, 398-399; Kletnieks v Brookhaven Mem. Assn., 53 AD2d 169, 175), and that discretion was not abused in this case (cf, Daum v Auburn Mem. Hosp., 198 AD2d 899). The court properly rejected defendant’s contention that plaintiffs expert, a physician specializing in radiology, was not competent to render an expert opinion with respect to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Meiselman v. Crown Heights Hospital, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Fuller v. PreisNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Kletnieks v. Brookhaven Memorial Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Behan v. Data Probe International, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Daum v. Auburn Memorial HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Frank v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Pares v. LaPradeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Willett v. SchneidermesserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001