Legal Opinion

In re Ohio Copper Mining Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 27, 1917PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In the Matter of the Ohio Copper Mining Company, bankrupt. On motion for an order restraining certain parties from taking proceedings in other courts.

1Opinion of the Court

MAYER, District Judge.

This is a motion in the nature of a bill of peace for—

■“an order * * * restraining the said Arthur P. Heinze, Madison Real Property & Security Company, Western Development Company, United Copper Securities Company, International and Intercontinental Mining & Refining Company, Stockholders’ Protective Committee, of which William J. Brown is ■chairman, Frederick! W. Frost, OttQ B. Schmidt, and others from taking any •other or further steps or proceedings of any character to interfere with the ■said bankrupt estate and the enjoyment thereof, as well as the title thereto,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Riverdale Cotton Mills v. Alabama & Georgia Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. In re Swofford Bros. Dry Goods Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1910
  3. Central Trust Co. v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hadad v. LewisDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1974
  2. Engelhardt v. Hermitage Bldg. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
  3. In re AlbrightDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Andrews v. Andrews & Andrews, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API