Legal Opinion

Miller v. Foust

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 1935No. 2358Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By STEVENS, J.

Numerous errors are assigned by defendant, as follows:

1. Error in the rejection of evidence offered by defendant.

2. Error in the admission of evidence offered by plaintiff.

3. That the judgment is against the weight of the evidence.

4. That the judgment is excessive.

5. That the action was not brought within the time limited by law.

6. Other errors apparent upon the face of the record.

The first assignment of error has to do with the refusal of the trial court in this case to permit defendant to testify regarding certain evidence, which was offered by plaintiff and received by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cole v. . SweetNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Young v. MontgomeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Comstock's Admr. v. JacobsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1915
  4. In re the Estate of BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Boyd v. Conshohocken Worsted MillsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API