Legal Opinion

Betty Bernstein v. Robert Levenson

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 3, 1971No. 14631_1PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiffs in a stockholders’ derivative action appeal from an order dismissing their complaint on the ground that they had failed to establish that the amount in controversy exceeded $10,000, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The suit sought recovery of $545,955 on behalf of the corporation, but admittedly the plaintiffs’ pro rata share of these damages, measured by their stockhold-ings, was jointly only $8,145.30. The district court, relying principally on Snyder v. Harris, 394 U.S. 332, 89 S.Ct. 1053, 22 L.Ed.2d 319 (1969), held the plaintiffs’ portion of the damages could not be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,405 Joe L. Smallwood v. Pearl Brewing Company, Southdown, Inc., Zapata Norness, Inc., Albert J. Rangeand D. Doyle MizeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  2. Fujimoto v. AuHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Little v. CookeSupreme Court of Virginia · 2007
  4. Molever v. LevensonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
  5. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Rochester v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API