Betty Bernstein v. Robert Levenson
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Per curiam
The plaintiffs in a stockholders’ derivative action appeal from an order dismissing their complaint on the ground that they had failed to establish that the amount in controversy exceeded $10,000, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The suit sought recovery of $545,955 on behalf of the corporation, but admittedly the plaintiffs’ pro rata share of these damages, measured by their stockhold-ings, was jointly only $8,145.30. The district court, relying principally on Snyder v. Harris, 394 U.S. 332, 89 S.Ct. 1053, 22 L.Ed.2d 319 (1969), held the plaintiffs’ portion of the damages could not be…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,405 Joe L. Smallwood v. Pearl Brewing Company, Southdown, Inc., Zapata Norness, Inc., Albert J. Rangeand D. Doyle MizeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Fujimoto v. AuHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
- Little v. CookeSupreme Court of Virginia · 2007
- Molever v. LevensonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Rochester v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.