State v. Cooper
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Dissent
The only act committed was peaceful picketing. Defendant did not accost or interfere with any person. He was alone on the street. He was found guilty of disorderly conduct for doing an act which was not unlawful and which he had a right to do.
1. Peaceful picketing is lawful. In Steffes v. Motion Picture M. O. Union, 136 Minn. 200, 202,161 N.W. 524, we held that it was not unlawful in a labor dispute for a picket to walk up and down the street in front of plaintiff's place of business displaying a banner that plaintiff was unfair to organized labor. We said:
"The term 'unfair' as used by…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Senn v. Tile Layers Protective UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- New Negro Alliance v. Sanitary Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Exchange Bakery & Restaurant, Inc. v. RifkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Nann v. RaimistNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Iron Molders' Union No. 125 of Milwaukee v. Allischalmers Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1908
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.