Legal Opinion
Farbenfabriken Bayer, A. G. v. Sterling Drug Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 27, 1961No. Civ. A. 908-55PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM F. SMITH, Chief Judge.
This is a civil action under the antitrust laws, and particularly Section 1 of the Sherman Act, as amended, 69 Stat. 282, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1, and Sections 4 and 16, of the Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 731 and 737, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 15 and 26. The action is brought by the plaintiff, a corporation organized under the laws of Germany, as the “legal successor in interest” to certain rights of Farbenfab-riken vorm. Friedrich Bayer and Company, et ais. The essential allegations of the complaint are summarized in the earlier opinion of this Court. Farben- fabriken Bayer, A. G. v.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Cope v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Russell v. ToddSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Ring v. SpinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Tobacco and Allied Stocks, Inc. v. Transamerica Corporation, Howard S. CullmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dayco Corporation v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Dayco Corporation v. Firestone Tire & Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation v. General Telephone & Electronics Corporation and Hawaiian Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Kronfeld v. First Jersey National BankDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
- Allied Corp. v. FrolaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
- Pennsylvania Dental Ass'n v. Medical Service Ass'n of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.