Riches v. New York City Council
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Catterson, J. (dissenting).
Because I believe that the majority has chosen to ignore allegations of misfeasance involving the allocation of more than $17,000,000 in municipal funds to a “slush fund,” as well as more than a century of law, I respectfully dissent. New York City Charter § 1109 provides for a summary judicial inquiry at the behest of citizen taxpayers of the City of New York. It is unique in its scope and exists solely to shine the light of public scrutiny on the actions of public officials. For the reasons that follow, I find that it is abundantly clear that section 1109 is not…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Raritan Development Corp. v. SilvaNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Matter of RichardsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Jones v. BeameNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- City of New York v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. Broadway RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.