Upton v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
The question in this case is whether the alleged father of a bastard child has voluntarily assumed the trole of parenthood so as to require him to support the child and be subject to the penalties of section 90, Title 34, Code, for willfully not doing so while she is still under eighteen years of age and in destitute or necessitous circumstances.
It is our understanding there is no common law duty on the part of the father of a bastard child to support it. Title 6 of our -Code makes provision for such limited support, and for a long time in this State that was such a father’s…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Law v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
3Cited by6 opinions
- Turner v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958
- Baugh v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Hayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
- C.V. v. J.M.J.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- Ex Parte CVSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.