Dahiya v. Talmidge International, Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1DissentDeMOSS, Circuit Judge
I > agree with the majority that if the district court’s remand determination was based on a lack of removal jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) likely precludes, us from *212reviewing the remand order itself.1 However, I respectfully disagree with the majority's dismissal for lack of jurisdiction and would conclude that we have appellate jurisdiction over the order denying arbitration and that the district court erred in refusing to order arbitration under the Convention Treaty (the “Convention”), 9 U.S.C. § 201 et seq.
I. This Court can review the district court’s denial of the motion to compel…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.