Bell v. Farmers' Nat. Bank
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBotjldin, J.
The primary purpose of the bill is to cancel a mortgage upon real estate of the wife, upon the ground that it was given as security for the debt of the husband. The case made by the pleadings and proof is briefly this:
J. S. Bell, the husband, was a cotton buyer in Opelika. In the summer of 1923 he applied to the Farmers’ National Bank of Opelika to finance his business during the approaching cotton season. Because of former dealings wherein J. S. Bell had become and was still largely indebted to the bank, his request was refused, unless he would arrange an advance credit or deposit of $5,000…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lamkin v. LovellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Lester v. JacobsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Elkins v. Bank of HenrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Staples v. City Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Hall v. GordonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dewberry v. Bank of Standing RockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Sansom v. SturkieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Mitchell v. Sessoms Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Alabama Farm Bureau Credit Corporation v. HelmsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Ex Parte LacySupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.