Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Board of Equalization v. Wilson

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1936No. 7,497Published

1Dissent

Mr. Justice Anderson:

I dissent. The primary question for solution in this case is whether a family allowance made by order of court under the authority of section 10146, Revised Codes of 1921, is an item not subject to inheritance tax, and therefore, in addition to the statutory exemption allowed a widow and the other items, deductible from the gross value of an estate. This question involves the construction of certain statutory provisions.

Our last Inheritance Tax Law is Chapter 65, Laws 1923, to which a few amendments since made are in nowise controlling here." Section 1 of the Act provides…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. McDougalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Mills v. State Board of EqualizationMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Billings v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  4. State Ex Rel. Nagle v. SullivanMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Crenshaw v. MooreTennessee Supreme Court · 1911

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API