Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Noble Metals International, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1DissentReinhardt, Circuit Judge
I would hold that the sanctions imposed upon Noble and Moorgate for discovery violation were excessive and unlawful. In my opinion, ordering that the plaintiffs complaint be taken as established as a Rule 37(b)(2) sanction was an abuse of discretion. Moreover, I conclude that the district court erred in failing to provide adequate warning to the defendants and failing to consider lesser alternative sanctions. On a separate point, I believe that the order denying Noble and Moorgate the opportunity to use any of their assets for purposes of attorneys fees was erroneous.
In United States ex rel.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ann J. Malone v. United States Postal Service, an Agency of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Televideo Systems, Inc. K. Philip Hwang C. Gemma Hwang v. Fred P. Heidenthal, Individually and Dba South Harbor Investors and West Cliff SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. MonsantoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Adriana International Corp. v. ThoerenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.