Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gilbert v. Gladden

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 29, 1981Published

1Dissent

PASHMAN and SCHREIBER, JJ.,

dissenting.

The issue raised by the plaintiffs is whether the New Jersey Constitution vests the Legislature with plenary and unrestricted authority to fix any period of time within which a duly passed bill must be presented to the Governor. The majority holds that it does. We disagree. We fail to see how this case presents a nonjusticiable political question, as the majority concludes. Judicial review is not only constitutionally required here, but it is especially appropriate in this case where the political branches have undertaken an informal practice that…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Tenney v. BrandhoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API