Hulsey v. Smith
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Frankum, Justice.
It is essential to the validity and enforceability of a zoning regulation allegedly enacted by county commissioners that the regulation itself be spread upon the minutes of the commissioners so as to enable those affected thereby to know with certainty what uses are prohibited and what uses are permitted by the regulation and where such uses are permitted or prohibited. Accordingly, parol evidence is not admissible to prove the contents of such regulation or to identify, without more, a purported zoning map which is an integral part of such regulation and without which it…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. PetersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. HixSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Nashville, Chattanooga & Saint Louis Railway v. PeavlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- City Council of Augusta v. IrvinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- City of Waycross v. BoatrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hollberg v. Spalding CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Reynolds v. Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Addis v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
- Enviro Pro, Inc. v. Emanuel CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Waldrop v. Stratton & McLendon, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.