Legal Opinion

State v. Grant

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 23, 1992No. C14-91-00321-CR, A14-91-00322-CRPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DRAUGHN, Justice.

Co-appellees, Winston A. Grant and Ne-ville Antonio Kelly, were charged with the felony possession of marihuana. The trial court granted appellee’s motion to suppress the marihuana evidence found in luggage located near the appellees inside a Houston bus station. The State appeals, alleging the trial court erred in suppressing the evidence because the appellees had abandoned the luggage, and their subsequent arrest following the positive reaction by the narcotics dog to the luggage, was constitutionally proper. We reverse and remand.

The record reflects that Houston…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1993
  2. Reyes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1995
  3. Small v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998
  4. Aitch v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. Tate v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API