Legal Opinion

Ludwick v. Doe

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided August 18, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUSANO, Judge.

This is a negligence action arising out of a collision between two automobiles. It was tried to a jury. The complaint referred to the sole defendant as “John Doe.” The defendant was further identified in the complaint as “an unidentified uninsured motorist.” Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Company (Insurance Company) was served with process pursuant to T.C.A § 56-7-1206, a part of the uninsured motorist statutory scheme, T.C.A. § 56-7-1201 et seq. The Insurance Company, which insured the owner of the vehicle being driven by the plaintiff at the time of the accident,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Eaton v. McLainTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Worrall v. Kroger Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  3. National Gas Distributors, Inc. v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Tennessee Manufactured Housing Ass'n v. Metropolitan Government of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  5. Austin v. Memphis Publishing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. LevittCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  2. City of Church Hill v. Roger ElliottCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2018
  3. City of Church Hill v. Roger ElliottCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2017
  4. Sandor Turucz v. Betty T. MadewellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API