Legal Opinion
Asturiana De Zinc Marketing, Inc. v. LaSalle Rolling Mills, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 29, 1998No. 97 CIV. 6053 (JSR)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
RAKOFF, District Judge.
In law, as in medicine, there are many nostrums but no panaceas. Ironically, the vaunted informality of arbitration may invite the arbitrator to be arbitrary — for who will ever know the difference? Still, businesses know what they are getting when they agree to arbitrate and cannot be heard to complain unless the results plainly manifest disregard of law and reason. In the instant ease, two components of an arbitration award fail to survive even this modest scrutiny, but the rest pass muster.
The issue comes before this Court upon the petition of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- DiRussa v. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Painewebber Incorporated v. Michael J. Bybyk and Joyce O. BybykCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Tempo Shain Corporation Neptune Plus Corporation v. Bertek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Stewart Tabori & Chang, Inc. & StewartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Beacon Towers Condominium Trust v. AlexMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
- Stone & Webster, Inc. v. Triplefine International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Bear Stearns & Co. v. FulcoNew York Supreme Court · 2008
- Jefferies LLC v. GegeheimerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.