Legal Opinion

Orange County, New York v. United States Department of Labor

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 3, 1980No. 80-4068PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Appeal from an order of the Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, holding that Orange County’s hiring of Mrs. Janet Allard violated the nepotism restrictions of Section 98.22 of the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act (CETA) regulations, 29 C.F.R. Part. 98.

The argument that the administrative law judge misconstrued the meaning of the word “nepotism” in the regulation and because Mr. and Mrs. Allard worked in different departments no violation occurred is unavailing. Mr. Allard was both “a member of the immediate family” and “engaged in an administrative capacity.”…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Consortium of Community Based Organizations v. DonovanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1982
  2. Moellendick v. West Virginia Governor's Office Of Economic And Community DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  3. Moellendick v. West Virginia Governor's Office of Economic & Community DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  4. Prince George's County, Maryland v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  5. CONSORTIUM OF COM. BASED ORGANIZATIONS v. DonovanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API