Legal Opinion

Vanatta v. Delaware & Bound Brook Railroad

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 15, 1876PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On motion for a judgment upon an information in the nature of a writ of quo warranto.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dixon, J.

On November 5th, 1875, the Attorney-General, ex-officio, filed an information in the nature of a writ of *283quo warranto, praying process against the Delaware and Bound Brook Railroad Company, and that they might answer to the state by what warrant they claimed to use certain franchises in the information set forth. Thereupon he caused to be issued to the defendants a summons, tested on the same day, returnable November 12th, 1875, calling upon them to answer the information, which summons was returned by the sheriff of Mercer county, “duly…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. RichardsonNew York Supreme Court · 1825

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Watson v. ClaughtonSupreme Court of Florida · 1948
  2. State Ex Rel. Watson v. Dade County Roofing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API