Legal Opinion

In re HURLEY

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1929No. 1839Published

1Opinion of the Court

*888OPINION OP THE COURT BY

PARSONS, .T.

This is a proceeding in quo warranto to require the repondent to show by what authority he claims and occupies tjie office of supervisor of the County of Kauai for the district of Waimea. The petitioners, among whom are two unsuccessful candidates for the position now held by respondent, aver among other things that the respondent was not a resident of Waimea either on the Sth day of October, 1927, when he ivas nominated as a Republican candidate for said position at the primary election then and there held, or on the 15th day of November, 1927, at the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shelton v. TiffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  2. Hairston v. HairstonMississippi Supreme Court · 1854
  3. In re Roberts' WillNew York Court of Chancery · 1840
  4. Lymer v. KumalaeHawaii Supreme Court · 1926
  5. The Ann GreenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1812

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API