Legal Opinion

Alpena Lumber Co. v. Fletcher

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1882PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Alpena. Burn to establish rights in lands and for partition. Complainants in the supplemental bill appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

The purpose of the original bill was to establish the right of complainant’to certain undivided interests in pine lands, in which defendant Fletcher also had interests, and to have partition made. The complainant having subsequently made an assignment for the benefit of its creditors, a supplemental bill was filed by the assignees having in view the same general ob ject.

The history of the controversy, as disclosed by the pleadings and accompanying exhibits, is substantially as follows r

In the summer of 1872, George Prentiss, then resident in Detroit, entered into negotiations with George N.…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Van Orman v. NelsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. City of Detroit v. A. W. Kutsche & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1944
  3. McCornick and Co. v. Tolmie Bros.Idaho Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Bell v. ToddMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  5. George W. Riley and Goldie I. Riley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API