Legal Opinion

State v. McCroy

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 2000No. S-98-330, S-98-331, S-98-332PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephan, J.

Barry D. McCroy appeals from the court’s denial of his motions for postconviction relief without conducting an evidentiary hearing. McCroy asserts that he is entitled to postconviction relief because his counsel at the time of his plea-based convictions had been previously disbarred in Colorado, and was subsequently disbarred in Nebraska. McCroy contends that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel (1) under a per se rule because of the disbarments and (2) because his attorney failed to honor his request to perfect a direct appeal. We conclude that the first claim is without merit,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Paul Peter Solina, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. Barbara Mouzin, United States of America v. Alfonso CarvajalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. John NovakCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. AriasWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. HessNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. VanderpoolNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. CaddyNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Adkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2004

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API