Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. American International Insurance Co. of Puerto Rico

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided March 23, 2005No. 03-2256PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LYNCH, Circuit Judge.

The question presented is whether a regional diagnostic and treatment center which treats only ambulatory patients and has an emergency room independent of a hospital is subject to the requirements of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA), 42 U.S.C. § 1395dd.

The district court, ruling on a suit by the parents of a four-month old baby girl who died after being seen in the emergency room of a Diagnostic and Treatment Center (“Centro de Diagnóstico y Tratamien-to”) (“CDT”) in Corozal, Puerto Rico, held that an EMTALA suit was actionable. We accepted…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Correa v. Hospital San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  3. Lopez-Soto v. HawayekCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  4. Rational Software v. Sterling CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Colburn v. Parker Hannifin/Nichols Portland DivisionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  2. Sullivan v. City of SpringfieldCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  3. Commercial Union Insurance v. PesanteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  4. Sun Capital Partners III, LP v. New England Teamsters & Trucking Industry Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  5. Garcia-Rubiera v. FortunoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API