Legal Opinion
Murray v. Motorola, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 19, 2004No. MDL. 1421; Nos CIV. 01-MD-1421, CIV. CCB-02-4047, CIV. CCB-02-4048, CIV. CCB-02-4049, CIV. CCB-02-4050, CIV. CCB-02-4051, CIV. CCB-02-4052PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BLAKE, District Judge.
On June 21, 2002, a consolidated and renewed motion for remand filed in the Pinney, Farina, Gilliam, Gimpelson, and Naquin actions in this multidistrict litigation was denied.1 I held that federal question jurisdiction supported removal based on the substantial federal question doctrine. In re Wireless Tel. Radio Frequency Emissions Prods. Liab. Litig., 216 F.Supp.2d 474 (D.Md.2002).2 The prior remand decision did not address similar motions to remand now pending in the Murray, Schofield, Cochran, Keller, Schwamb, and Agro actions.3 The plaintiffs filed these…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McKee v. AT & T CORP.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re Wireless Telephone Radio Frequency Emissions Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004