Legal Opinion

Xyovest, Inc. v. Limbach

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1992No. 91-146PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The Tax Commissioner argues that the additional payments (reimbursements or pass-through payments of personal property tax) are like any other expense of doing business. It was, she argues, the obligation of Xyovest as owner of the equipment to pay personal property taxes due and the fact that Xyovest contractually shifted this responsibility to its lessees does not change that fact. Under Xyovest’s master lease, it is argued, a lessee undertook an additional condition of its lease: as a part of the consideration paid or promised to be paid in return for the continued possession and use of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Material Contractors, Inc. v. DonahueOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Columbus Equipment Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Avery Health Care Ctr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. Leasing Dynamics, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API