Legal Opinion

Ardmore State Bank v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 29, 1916No. 6667PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from County Court, Carter County; W. F. Freeman, Judge. Action by E. H. Thompson against the Ardmore State Bank. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

WATTS, C.

Plaintiff in error appeals from a judgment of the county court of Carter county wherein it was held to pay $120 and attorney’s fee of $50, because it had charged and collected $60, which was more than the lawful rate of interest for the time a . loan ran.

The parties do not differ as to the facts, but the law is the bone of contention. After payment of the principal and the interest mentioned, ■ and on January —, 1913, defendant in error served the following notice on plaintiff in error:

“To the Ardmore State Bank, Ardmore, Oklahoma— Gentlemen: I herewith make demand of you…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Farmers' & Mechanics' National Bank v. DearingSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Citizens' Nat. Bank of Kansas City v. DonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Waldner v. Bowden State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Henderson National Bank v. AlvesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1891
  5. Lebanon National Bank v. KarmanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Citizens' State Bank of Ft. Gibson v. StrahanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Shoenfelt v. Donna Belle Loan & Inv. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Weatherly v. BristowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API