Mote v. Aetna Life Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWood, Circuit Judge
In fact-specific cases like this one, the court of appeals is usually defacto the last stop on the road for the litigants. It is thus critical that we get the facts right, even if we agree on the governing legal standards. Here, although I agree with the majority’s assessment of the claims against Aetna, the administrator of the plan at issue, I must part ways with its evaluation of Brenda Mote’s claims against the long-term disability plan (“the Plan”). According to Mote’s treating physicians and other specialists, since at least 1998 she has suffered from fibromyalgia, migraines, a sleep…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Judith Perlman v. Swiss Bank Corporation Comprehensive Disability Protection PlanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- John Halpin v. W.W. Grainger, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Mark C. Hawkins v. First Union Corporation Long-Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Hackett v. Xerox Corp. Long-Term Disability Income PlanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.