Legal Opinion

J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 19, 1960No. 63712; protest 58/11858-10002 (Chicago)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawrence, Judge:

Certain imported brass sieves were classified by the collector of customs as laboratory instruments in paragraph 360 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1001, par. 360), as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 91 Treas. Dec. 150, T.D. 54108, and duty was imposed thereon at the rate of 27 per centum ad valorem.

Plaintiff claims that the articles should have been classified in paragraph 397 of said act (19 U.S.C. § 1001, par. 397), as modified, supra, as articles, partly or wholly manufactured, composed…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schick X-Ray Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. A. W. Fenton Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  3. Paillard, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  4. A. W. Fenton Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  5. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API