Legal Opinion
Greathouse v. Dunlap
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio
Decided December 15, 1843PublishedCited by 3 opinions
At law.
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF
THE COURT.
This action of covenant is founded on the following instrument: “Whereas, there is now depending in the Mason circuit court, in the state of Kentucky, an- action at common law, in which William Greathouse is plaintiff and John B. Mahan is defendant, in which the said Mahan has been and is confined in the jail of Mason county for want of special bail; and it is agreed by the said William Greathouse to discharge him from custody on condition that William Dunlap, of Brown county, in the state of Ohio, shall enter into this bond: Now, therefore, I, the said William Dunlap, do…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People ex relat. Bush & Higby v. CollinsNew York Supreme Court · 1811
- Vrooman v. PhelpsNew York Supreme Court · 1807
- Slocum & Hogan v. DespardNew York Supreme Court · 1832
- Dale v. RooseveltCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1827
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hoitt v. HolcombSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1851
- Ray v. McDevittMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Williams v. MearsOhio Superior Court, Cincinnati · 1859