Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ray v. McDevitt

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1901Published

Error to Jackson; Peck, J. Assumpsit by Pitts B. Ray against John McDevitt and Edward C. Morrissey on an indemnity bond. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants bring error.

1DissentHooker, J.

In my opinion, a sheriff who contracts with an execution debtor to omit service of his execution, and does omit to serve it accordingly, is guilty of malfeasance in office; and it is as true when the writ is a fieri facias as it is in the case of a capias ad satisfaciendum. The contract is admittedly illegal and void in the latter case, and there is no difference in principle. Where parties make an illegal contract, the law declines to enforce it, leaving the parties where it finds them. This case is not changed by the fact that one of the parties has profited by the arrangement. That is…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Penn v. BornmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Page v. TrufantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1806
  3. Scott v. ShawNew York Supreme Court · 1816
  4. Cole v. ParkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
  5. Millard v. CanfieldNew York Supreme Court · 1830

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API